UCO COVID-19 protocols remain in place for the spring 2021 semester. Masks are required on campus when around others.
Important resources: COVID-19 Testing | Report Exposure/Positive Test | On-Campus Vaccine Clinic | COVID-19 Vaccination Self-Reporting | Virtual services | COVID-19 website
The Professional Education Unit at the University of Central Oklahoma is currently accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) using the standards of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). This accreditation covers both initial teacher preparation programs and advanced educator preparation programs. UCO is a charter member of NCATE and has been continuously accredited since 1954.
July 1, 2013 was the day of the de facto consolidation of NCATE and the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC), making CAEP the new, sole specialized accreditor for educator preparation. The mission of CAEP is accountability and continued improvement of educator preparation. The accreditation process utilizes rigorous standards for educator preparation programs and holds accredited institutions accountable for providing continuous evidence of meeting these standards.
UCO is the third largest preparer of teachers in Oklahoma and, as a result of a review on 2016, has received renewal of its NCATE/CAEP accreditation through 2023.
- List of Initial and Advanced Programs
- UCO/AACTE Position Statement in Support of Enhancing Educator Preparation
- The Value of Teacher Preparation Programs
- One-Pager Value of Teacher Preparation
CAEP 8 Annual Measures
1. Impact on P-12 Learning and Development
In-service Case Studies
P-12 students’ pre- and post-scores during an instructional unit and teachers’ reflective responses confirm that UCO education program graduates who have been certified (completers) have a positive impact on student learning and development.
2. Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness
In-service Teacher Evaluation Performance by P12 Administrator
Building principals rate UCO completers, overall, as being effective across all categories of the Teacher Leader Effectiveness evaluation. This finding remains true when disaggregated by teachers’ certification area, ethnicity, and binomial gender.
In-service Teacher case studies
Teacher self-reports, employer evaluations, and university observations confirm UCO completers demonstrate effective performance during the first year of teaching.
3. Satisfaction of Employers and Employment Milestones
Employers report that UCO completers, overall, demonstrate expected knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions as a first-year teacher.
- 2017-2018 Initial Programs Satisfaction of Employers
- 2018-2019 Initial Programs Employer Survey with Comparisons
- 2019-2020 Initial Programs Satisfaction of Employers
- 2018-2019 Advanced Satisfaction of Employers
- National Board Certifications
- List of Milestones
Evidence confirms UCO completers experience success, emerge as experts and leaders, and contribute to the profession.
4. Satisfaction of Completers
UCO completers, overall, report they were able to demonstrate expected knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions as a first-year teacher based on the training providing.
- 2017-2018 Initial Programs Satisfaction of UCO Completers
- 2018-2019 Initial Programs Satisfaction of UCO Completers
- 2018-2019 Advanced Programs Programs Satisfaction of UCO Completers
- 2018-2019 Initial Programs Exit Survey
- 2019-2020 Initial Program Exit Survey
5. Graduation Rates
Data demonstrate UCO education students (teacher candidates) meet selective criteria for program admission, transition, and graduation. Almost all graduates of our programs do so within 3 years of being admitted to Teacher Education.
6. Candidate Success at Meeting Certification Requirements
UCO teacher candidates and master’s level educational professional candidates demonstrate the ability to meet program criteria and to pass certification tests at or above the state average.
Oklahoma Certification Tests
- Initial Program Completers Rate
- Initial Programs Oklahoma Subject Area Test (OSAT) Reports
- Initial Programs Oklahoma Professional Teaching Exam (OPTE) Reports
- Advanced Programs Oklahoma Subject Area Test (OSAT) Reports
Title II Reports
- 2018 Title II Report for 2016-2017
- 2019 Title II Report for 2017-2018
- 2020 Title II Reports for 2018-2019
7. Opportunity for Completers to be Hired
Oklahoma City metropolitan area and state data are clear that there is a strong demand for teachers and other education professionals in almost all certification areas.
Supply and Demand
- Supply and Demand
- State Minimum Teacher Salary Schedule
- USDE Recognized Oklahoma Teacher Shortage List
- OSDE Brief on Teacher Shortage
8. Student Loan Default Rate and Consumer Information
Pre-Service Performance Assessments
Student Teachers are teacher candidates who complete a 16-week internship in P12 schools. They are mentored, supervised and evaluated by University Supervisors and by P12 Mentor Teachers (co-teachers).
University Supervisors are clinical faculty from UCO who mentor and evaluate the performance of student teachers during their 16-week internship in P12 schools. University Supervisors are expert educators who have demonstrated effectiveness in their careers as P12 teachers and school leaders, including some who serve as full-time Teacher Education faculty.
Mentor Teachers (co-teachers) are P12 instructors who guide, supervise and evaluate the performance of student teachers during their 16-week internship in P12 schools. Mentor Teachers are deliberately selected educators who have 3 years or more of successful teaching experience and who have completed UCO’s co-teacher training. UCO collaborates with school administrators to determine Mentor Teachers.
Assessment of Student Teachers
The matrices linked below provide the aggregate average rating University Supervisors and Mentor Teachers (co-teachers) gave Student Teachers regarding their performance on numerous criteria. These data are part of the assessment system used to determine the overall effectiveness of each UCO student teacher.
- Ratings of Student Teachers (2017-2018)
- Mentor Teacher Ratings of Student Teachers (2018-2022)
- University Supervisor Ratings of Student Teachings (2018-2022)
Assessment of Mentor Teachers and University Supervisors
The matrices linked below provide the aggregate average ratings of the support and guidance provided by Mentor Teachers (co-teachers) and University Supervisors. These evaluation data are one part of an assessment system used to determine the overall quality and effectiveness of each mentor and supervisor.
- Student Teachers Ratings of Mentor Teachers (2018-2022)
- University Supervisors Ratings of Mentor Teachers (2018-2022)
- Student Teachers Ratings of University Supervisors (2018-2022)
- Mentor Teachers Ratings of University Supervisors (2018-2022)
Assessment of Teacher Candidates
The matrices linked below provide the aggregate average rating Mentor Teachers (co-teachers) gave Teacher Candidates regarding their performance during their initial clinical experiences (CE1 and CE2). The means trend upward as our Teacher Candidates develop as future teachers with gained experience.
- Mentor Teacher Ratings of Teacher Candidate in Clinical Experience 1 (2018-2022)
- Mentor Teacher Ratings of Teacher Candidates in Clinical Experience 2 (2018-2022)